| GLOBAL Partition - 14037 [message #241114] |
Mon, 28 May 2007 06:31  |
Brayan
Messages: 315
Registered: June 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi,
I'm creating a Global partitioned index
Here the partition column identity_code is number in DDMMYYYY format.
create unique index DEPOSITS on DEPOSITS(identity_code, id_number)
global partition by range(identity_code)
(Partition MAR_2005 values less than (01042005) tablespace index_ts,
Partition MAR_DEC_2006 values less than (01012007) tablespace index_ts,
Partition JAN_2007 values less than (01022007) tablespace index_ts,
Partition FEB_2007 values less than (01032007) tablespace index_ts,
Partition MAR_2007 values less than (01042007) tablespace index_ts,
Partition APR_2007 values less than (01052005) tablespace index_ts,
Partition MAY_2007 values less than (01062005) tablespace index_ts,
Partition MAX_PARTITION values less than (MAXVALUE) tablespace index_ts
)
While creating it generates error "ORA-14037" becuase partition MAR_DEC_2006 bound value "01012007" is lesser than MAR_2005 bound value 01042005.
Partition key is also can not be expression 
Is there any way, I can build this index(Without changing the ranges) ??
Brayan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: GLOBAL Partition - 14037 [message #241252 is a reply to message #241114] |
Tue, 29 May 2007 00:20  |
Brayan
Messages: 315
Registered: June 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michel,
The partition column is number type in Table. From users perspective its a date in DDMMYYYY format.
It is like
31012007
28022007
31032007
...
in this case also, 28022007(represents 28-Feb-07) is lesser than 31012007 (31-Jan-07).
Because of this reason I cannot partition by range.
Is there a way????
Brayan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: GLOBAL Partition - 14037 [message #241294 is a reply to message #241114] |
Tue, 29 May 2007 02:20 |
Brayan
Messages: 315
Registered: June 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michel,
This is a standard Oracle Financial Services Application.
I have partitioned the tables according to the requirement of the application for multiprocessing. That works fine.
Also for the backup stratergy and making the history data as readonly.
As far this partitioned index, there is no specific requirement. Incase of any Alter table operation, I need to manually rebuild the index. That is the reason I'm building a global partitioned index.
Brayan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: GLOBAL Partition - 14037 [message #241317 is a reply to message #241114] |
Tue, 29 May 2007 03:58 |
Brayan
Messages: 315
Registered: June 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Michel,
I did not understand your question correctly!!
Definately a normal index will work for the partitioned table.
But in this case I'm trying to avoid the rebuild of index every time whenever there is "alter table".
Brayan
|
|
|
|
| Re: GLOBAL Partition - 14037 [message #241333 is a reply to message #241317] |
Tue, 29 May 2007 04:56 |
 |
Michel Cadot
Messages: 68686
Registered: March 2007
Location: Nanterre, France, http://...
|
Senior Member
Account Moderator |
|
|
My question was that he can't partition his index but was able to partition the table.
So I ask why he can't partition this index while he can with the table.
But maybe I misunderstood what he posted (this would not be surprising).
Regards
Michel
|
|
|
|
] 
Blog
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
